MATTER OF HOPKINS v. FEDERICO

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence adduced at the hearing established that the appellant committed acts constituting disorderly conduct ( see, People v. Stephen, 153 Misc.2d 382; People v. Bulin, 142 Misc.2d 776), which constituted a basis for granting the order of protection ( see, Family Ct Act § 812).

The court had jurisdiction to issue the order of protection in that the parties, as in-laws, are within the category of persons covered by the statute ( see, Family Ct Act § 812 [a]).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Thompson, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ.,