- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
NATIONAL AMUSEMENTS, INC. v. S. BRONX DEV
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Aug 6, 1998
The IAS Court correctly held that the underlying claim of mistake is untimely, having accrued when the subject lease was executed (see, Matter of Wallace v. 600 Partners Co., 86 N.Y.2d 543; Arrathoon v. East N.Y. Sav. Bank, 169 A.D.2d 804, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 808), and, notwithstanding our comment in Davis v. Davis ( 95 A.D.2d 674, 675), was not subject to a discovery accrual (see, First Natl. Bank v. Volpe, 217 A.D.2d 967, 968). Defendant's other arguments with regard to timeliness are without merit. In view of the foregoing, it is unnecessary to reach the parties' other contentions.
Concur — Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.