- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
U.S. v. MILLS
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Sep 1, 1998
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
PER CURIAM:
The court sua sponte grants rehearing to make the following change to the opinion published at 138 F.3d 928.
The following text, published at 138 F.3d at 931-32, is deleted:
First American rounded out the scheme in 1991 meetings with Aetna auditors about documentation; there, Jack and First American's counsel, Wayne Phears, denied knowing of "breaker flights" [5] and indeed berated Aetna for not trusting First American's records.
One such flight to Cozumel the week before the meeting carried both Jack and Phears.
The deleted text is replaced with the following:
In 1991 meetings with Aetna auditors about documentation, Jack and First American's counsel, Wayne Phears, denied knowing of unreported flights [5] and indeed berated Aetna for not trusting First American's records.
An unreported flight to Cozumel the week before the meeting carried both Jack and Phears.
In all other respects the published opinion remains unchanged. The petitions of the United States, Margie Mills, and Jack Mills for panel rehearing are DENIED.
OPINION MODIFIED ON REHEARING; PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING DENIED.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.