- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
QUINTANA v. MEI
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Oct 13, 1998
Since the record discloses the existence of factual issues respecting whether defendants, in the course of removing snow and ice accumulations on the public sidewalk abutting their residence, either created or heightened the hazard that is alleged to have caused plaintiff's fall and injury, defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied ( see, Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324).
Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Mazzarelli, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.