NORTON v. STATE

PER CURIAM.

Norton appeals the habitual offender sentence imposed following revocation of his probation. Because Norton was not sentenced as a habitual offender initially, he cannot be sentenced as such after revocation of probation. See Albritton v. State, 709 So.2d 101 (Fla. 1998); King v. State, 681 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 1996); Battle v. State, 710 So.2d 628 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Simon v. State, 684 So.2d 263 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.