- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. JEFFREY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Oct 29, 1998
Defendant's claim that the sentencing court's remarks concerning parole release constituted an enhanced sentence is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court's remarks were neither a directive to the Parole Board nor an enhancement of the promised sentence ( People v. Skinner, 232 A.D.2d 201, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 929; People v. Saldana, 221 A.D.2d 239, 240, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 1024).
Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.