POLLATOS v. GLASSER

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In light of the conflicting expert affidavits submitted by the parties, the Supreme Court properly concluded that triable questions of fact exist as to the alleged negligence of the appellant (see, Rotuba Extruders v. Ceppos, 46 N.Y.2d 223, 231; Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 N.Y.2d 395, 404; Pirrelli v. Long Is. R. R., 226 A.D.2d 166; Napierski v. Finn, 229 A.D.2d 869; Menekou v. Crean, 222 A.D.2d 418; Rudnitsky v. Robbins, 191 A.D.2d 488, 489).

Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and McGinity, JJ., concur.