HERNANDEZ v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on their claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress. While defendant City of New York's press release admitted that the City's laboratory may have mishandled plaintiff's blood sample, this admission does not constitute a sufficient ground to conclude as a matter of law that the acts and omissions complained of were "so extreme in degree and outrageous in character as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, so as to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community" ( Naturman v. Crain Communications, 216 A.D.2d 150; see also, Ugarriza v. Schmieder, 46 N.Y.2d 471, 475).

Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.