BRUHNS v. ANTONELLI

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The injured plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, was injured on the subject premises while showing the premises to prospective buyers. The injured plaintiff had gained access to the premises from the defendant R. J. Smith Realtors, Inc. (hereinafter the respondent), who was the listing real estate agent for the property. The respondent moved for summary judgment arguing, inter alia, that it owed no duty to the injured plaintiff.

As a general rule, liability for a dangerous condition on property is predicated upon ownership, occupancy, control, or special use ( see, Millman v. Citibank, 216 A.D.2d 278). Upon our review of the record, we find no evidence that would raise an issue of fact as to any of these elements. The respondent owed no duty of care to the injured plaintiff, and may not be held liable for the existence of an allegedly dangerous condition on the property. Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the respondent.

Mangano, P. J., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.