PEOPLE v. JONES

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claims regarding certain comments made by the prosecutor during summation are for the most part unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Tevaha, 84 N.Y.2d 879, 881; People v. Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641; People v. Scotti, 220 A.D.2d 543). In any event, most of the comments constituted a legitimate response to the defense counsel's summation ( see, People v. Griffith, 231 A.D.2d 530; People v. Rawlings, 144 A.D.2d 500; People v. Miller, 143 A.D.2d 1055), and none of the remarks was so prejudicial as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial ( see, People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396).

The court considered appropriate factors in imposing sentence ( see, People v. Barnes, 219 A.D.2d 527; People v. Jackson, 208 A.D.2d 862, 863), and we find no basis for reducing the sentence ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.