PEOPLE v. KEELING

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdicts of guilt were not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.