HARVEY v. STATE

PER CURIAM.

This is Mr. Harvey's eleventh appearance in this court challenging his 1991 criminal conviction. This appeal of a 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence has no merit and we affirm. We also warn appellant that the further filing of such appeals could result in a loss of gain time. See Hall v. State, 698 So.2d 576 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), review granted, 718 So.2d 168 (Fla. 1998).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., SHARP, W., and HARRIS, JJ., concur.