PEOPLE v. MARCIA

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the court improperly denied his application for youthful offender adjudication is unpreserved for appellate review, as he failed to object or move to withdraw his plea on this ground ( see, People v. Granton, 236 A.D.2d 624; People v. Williams, 204 A.D.2d 371). In any event, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the application ( see, CPL 720.20; People v. Wallace, 246 A.D.2d 676; People v. Schwarz, 183 A.D.2d 859).

The defendant's arguments concerning the court's application of the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C) are not reviewable on direct appeal from the judgment ( see, CPL 450.10, 450.30 Crim. Proc.; People v. Stevens, 91 N.Y.2d 270; People v. Kearns, 253 A.D.2d 768).

Mangano, P. J., Joy, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.