PEOPLE v. RODRIGUEZ

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the jury charge regarding interested witnesses was unbalanced is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245). In any event, the trial court's charge adequately conveyed to the jury the appropriate standards for evaluating a witness's testimony ( see, People v. Innis, 83 N.Y.2d 653; People v. Smith, 240 A.D.2d 600; People v. Herbert, 182 A.D.2d 639).

Bracken, J. P., O'Brien, Thompson and Friedmann, JJ., concur.