- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. MURRAY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Feb 10, 1999
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court committed reversible error by failing to respond adequately to the jury's request to read back certain testimony. We disagree. The record establishes that the court meaningfully responded to the jury's request by directing that all of the witness's relevant direct and cross-examination testimony be read to the jury ( see, People v. Sheriff, 234 A.D.2d 894, 895, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 910). The court did not err in refusing to direct the reading of testimony beyond that requested ( see, People v. Almodovar, 62 N.Y.2d 126, 132; People v. Sheriff, supra, at 895).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.