Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

STATE EX REL. CARROLL v. CORRIGAN

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Mar 3, 1999
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Judge Corrigan did not have any duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on Carroll's successive petition for postconviction relief. State ex rel. Write v. Goldsberry (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 271, 667 N.E.2d 391; State ex rel. Luna v. McGimpsey (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 485, 486, 659 N.E.2d 1278, 1278-1279.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER. C.J., DOUGLAS RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON JJ., concur.