- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. MENDEZ
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Mar 18, 1999
By pleading guilty, defendant waived his statutory speedy trial claim ( People v. O'Brien, 56 N.Y.2d 1009). Since defendant's speedy trial motion, while purportedly raising constitutional issues, failed to address the factors set forth in People v. Taranovich ( 37 N.Y.2d 422) and merely raised statutory issues, his constitutional claim is unpreserved ( People v. Rowe, 244 A.D.2d 295, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 930), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would reject it (supra).
Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Lerner, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.