Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

STATE v. SIDDAL

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 24, 1999

PER CURIAM.

Although we understand the trial court's intentions in imposing a downward departure sentence, the State's position is correct and the downward departure is not legally sustainable. As a consequence, we reverse the trial court's order and remand for resentencing within the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Whiting, 711 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.