- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
STATE v. SIDDAL
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 24, 1999
PER CURIAM.
Although we understand the trial court's intentions in imposing a downward departure sentence, the State's position is correct and the downward departure is not legally sustainable. As a consequence, we reverse the trial court's order and remand for resentencing within the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Whiting, 711 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
Reversed and remanded for resentencing.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.