Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

GREENBERG v. ALLEN, No. CV 97-0159535-S (Apr. 1, 1999)

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk at Stamford
Apr 1, 1999
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CT Page 4982

HICKEY, JUDGE.

Since the defendants/counterclaim plaintiffs did not comply with practice book ยง 10-51, by not designating the particular count of the amended complaint to which each special defense is addressed, the motion to strike the special defenses to the amended complaint (#144) is hereby granted. However, at this time, the court will grant the defendants' request for leave to amend their answer, special defenses and counterclaims to the amended complaint (#147) in order to cure this technical defect.

So Ordered.

HICKEY, J.