BARKOW v. NEW YORK DOWNTOWN HOSPITAL

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the moving defendants were, collectively, out-of-possession landlords, and may not be cast in liability under the circumstances of his case, for the plaintiff's fall over a "bump" in the carpeting in the appellants' law office ( see, Ortiz v. RVC Realty Co., 253 A.D.2d 802; Aprea v. Carol Mgt. Corp., 190 A.D.2d 838).

The appellants' remaining contention is without merit.

S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.