- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
KELLER v. CITY OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Apr 8, 1999
In light of the evidence showing the absence of defendant's custodial aide, whose duty was to clean up any food or drink that fell to the floor, and which indicated that salad had been on the floor of defendants' lunchroom for 20 minutes before plaintiff slipped on it, falling and injuring herself, there was a rational basis for the jury to infer (see, Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 499) that the complained of hazard had existed for a sufficient length of time to permit defendants' personnel to discover it and take remedial measures (see, Negri v. Stop Shop, 65 N.Y.2d 625; Kelsey v. Port Auth., 52 A.D.2d 801).
Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Sullivan, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.