SIDI v. SIDI

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to vacate the judgment entered upon his default in appearing ( see, Conner v. Conner, 240 A.D.2d 614; Morel v. Clacherty, 186 A.D.2d 638; Shaw v. Shaw, 97 A.D.2d 403; CPLR 5015).

Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.