- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. DIAZ
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Jun 29, 1999
The record is insufficiently clear as to the meaning of the court's excusal of four prospective jurors "on consent", following sidebar conferences conducted in defendant's absence. Accordingly, a reconstruction hearing is required to determine, if possible, whether the parties had agreed that the prospective jurors should be excused for cause, whether the court made that determination, or whether the jurors were excused for other reasons ( see, People v. Childs, 232 A.D.2d 308).
Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.