SHARP v. SHARP

Divorce — equitable distribution — third party — constructive trust — jury trial

A Court of Appeals decision is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that a third party to an equitable distribution action does not have a constitutional right to a jury trial on a claim seeking imposition of a constructive trust on property to which the third party holds legal title.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge Timmons-Goodson, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.