Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. CINTRON

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Oct 5, 1999

The record is insufficiently clear as to the court's reasons for its excusal of a prospective juror following a sidebar conference conducted in defendant's absence. Accordingly, a reconstruction hearing is required to determine, if possible, whether the excusal was for cause or the result of defense counsel's discretionary choice.

Concur — SULLIVAN, J.P., WILLIAMS, WALLACH, LERNER, FRIEDMAN, JJ.