- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. CINTRON
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Oct 5, 1999
The record is insufficiently clear as to the court's reasons for its excusal of a prospective juror following a sidebar conference conducted in defendant's absence. Accordingly, a reconstruction hearing is required to determine, if possible, whether the excusal was for cause or the result of defense counsel's discretionary choice.
Concur — SULLIVAN, J.P., WILLIAMS, WALLACH, LERNER, FRIEDMAN, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.