- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. IRVING
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 25, 1999
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Many of the defendant's contentions regarding remarks made by the prosecutor during summation are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05[2]). In any event, the prosecutor's statements were fair responses to arguments raised by the defense counsel during summation (see, People v. Rivera, 158 A.D.2d 723 ).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
BRACKEN, J.P., S. MILLER, KRAUSMAN, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.