PEOPLE v. WELLS

ORDERED that the order is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 without a hearing since he failed to submit sworn allegations substantiating or tending to substantiate all essential facts necessary to support his claim (see, CPL 440.30[4][b]; People v. Ford, 46 N.Y.2d 1021, 1023 ; People v. Leka, 209 A.D.2d 723, 725 ; People v. Lawson, 191 A.D.2d 514, 515 ).

O'BRIEN, J.P., SULLIVAN, ALTMAN, and KRAUSMAN, JJ., concur.