NELSON LA FEMINA v. PLATSKY

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The ruling of the trial judge in reducing a plainly excessive but otherwise uncontested claim to fees and costs for services by the attorneys for a guardianship estate was fully in accordance with the probate court's right and duty to protect the interests of the ward. See § 744.108, Fla. Stat. (1999); McGinnis v. Kanevsky, 564 So.2d 1141, 1143 n. 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Ash v. Coconut Grove Bank, 448 So.2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The attorneys asked for $20,412.50 in fees and $396.51 in costs for ten months of routine paperwork in an estate which, at the time of the application and largely because it had already been reduced by $23,000.00 previously awarded in fees and costs, amounted to $60,000.00. In the ruling which the lawyers have now summoned the gall to appeal, the court awarded an additional amount of "only" $10,000.00. Such an order should not only be approved, but commended, encouraged, and replicated.

Affirmed.