MATTER OF B

ORDERED that the appeals from so much of the orders of disposition as placed the children in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services are dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

ORDERED that the orders of disposition are affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeals from so much of the orders of disposition as placed the children with the Commissioner must be dismissed as academic because the orders expired in July 1998, and no appeal has been taken from orders extending placement. Nevertheless, although the original orders of disposition expired and have been replaced by orders extending the placement of the children with the Commissioner, the appeals from the findings of neglect are not academic, since a finding of neglect constitutes a permanent and significant stigma from which potential future consequences may flow (see, Matter of Eddie E., 219 A.D.2d 719 ; see also, Matter of Grossman v. Grossman, 238 A.D.2d 339 ; Matter of Cutrone v. Cutrone, 225 A.D.2d 767 ).

The Family Court's findings of neglect in this case were supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, Family Ct Act § 1046[b][i]). Where, as here, issues of credibility are presented, the hearing court's findings must be accorded great deference (see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v. Kim G., 240 A.D.2d 664, 665 ). The evidence supported the Family Court's determination that the mother had neglected the children (see, Matter of Irene O., 38 N.Y.2d 776, 777 ; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v. Kim G., supra).

Since any alleged deficiencies in the hearing transcript did not preclude meaningful appellate review of the issues raised by the mother, she was not denied due process of law (cf., People ex rel. Silbert v. Cohen, 29 N.Y.2d 12 ).

The mother's remaining contention is academic and, in any event, without merit.

O'BRIEN, J.P., RITTER, SANTUCCI, and FLORIO, JJ., concur.