SARAI v. SARAI

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the appellant's allegations are insufficient to form a basis for vacatur of the stipulation of settlement in this action (see, Cavalli v. Cavalli, 226 A.D.2d 666 ;Sontag v. Sontag, 114 A.D.2d 892 ). The record supports the court's determination that the appellant voluntarily and knowingly entered into the stipulation with competent counsel at his side (see,Daniel v. Daniel, 224 A.D.2d 573 ; Ruxton v. Ruxton, 181 A.D.2d 876 ). Accordingly, that branch of his motion which was to vacate the stipulation was properly denied.

O'BRIEN, J.P., RITTER, SANTUCCI, and FLORIO, JJ., concur.