Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

NIEVES v. CITY OF YONKERS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Jan 27, 2000
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff Dominick Nieves (hereinafter the plaintiff) was a Yonkers police officer who was accidentally shot by his partner, the defendant Richard Doyle, when the two men, who were investigating a burglarized house with their guns drawn, came across each other unexpectedly in the dark.

The plaintiff's General Municipal Law § 205-e claims against his municipal employer and his co-employee were properly dismissed since he collected benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c ( see, O'Hare v. City of New Rochelle, 249 A.D.2d 375; Damiani v. City of Buffalo, 198 A.D.2d 814; O'Dette v. Parton, 190 A.D.2d 1074; see also, Workers' Compensation Law § 29 Work. Comp.[6], 30 Work. Comp.[3]; Scannell v. Karlin, 252 A.D.2d 552).

RITTER, J.P., FRIEDMANN, FEUERSTEIN, and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.