PETERSON v. MELCHIONA

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, with costs to the plaintiff.

The plaintiff offered evidence that the defendant Sky Haulage, Inc. (hereinafter the defendant), had engaged in fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct, by making false statements in support of its prior motion, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. This evidence was sufficient to warrant the vacatur of the order dated September 15, 1994, which granted the defendant's prior motion (see, CPLR 5015[a][3]; Shaw v. Shaw, 97 A.D.2d 403 ).

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to reinstate the order dated January 4, 1993, striking the defendant's answer for failure to comply with discovery requests. In the order appealed from, the court vacated the judgment in favor of the defendant and reinstated the complaint, and, in addition, directed further discovery, thus affording the plaintiff the opportunity to fully and fairly litigate the action.

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.