VINOKUR v. PENNY LANE OWNERS CORP

The action was properly dismissed on the ground that plaintiff's claims, including that the warrant of eviction was obtained fraudulently, should have been raised in the Civil Court proceeding that resulted in the issuance of the warrant. A litigant's remedy for alleged fraud in the course of a legal proceeding "lies exclusively in that lawsuit itself, i.e., by moving pursuant to CPLR 5015 to vacate the civil judgment due to its fraudulent procurement, not a second plenary action collaterally attacking the judgment in the original action." (Yalkowsky v. Century Apts. Assocs., 215 A.D.2d 214, 215; see also,Matter of Stillwell, 139 N.Y. 337, 340-341). The same is true with respect to plaintiff's claim that the alterations underlying the judgment of possession have been cured, an issue that has now been considered on the merits by Civil Court and is pending before Appellate Term (see, Ansonia Assocs. v. Costa, 167 A.D.2d 134, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 802). The lease provision for attorneys' fees covers this litigation brought by plaintiff to be restored to possession (see, Simithis v. 4 Keys Leasing Maintenance Co., 151 A.D.2d 339, 341-342), and, accordingly, we modify to award the attorneys' fees to the coop.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.