Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

JOSEPH v. CHERRY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Feb 24, 2000
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant met her initial burden of establishing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning ofInsurance Law ยง 5102(d). It was then incumbent upon the plaintiff to come forward with admissible evidence sufficient to create an issue of fact (see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 956-957 ). The plaintiff failed to do so (see, Dalessandro v. Amboy Bus Co., Inc., 262 A.D.2d 442; [2d Dept., June 14, 1999]; Burnett v. Miller, 255 A.D.2d 541 ; Ryan v. Xuda, 243 A.D.2d 457 ; Lincoln v. Johnson, 225 A.D.2d 593 ; Traugott v. Konig, 184 A.D.2d 765 ).