- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
ROSENBAUM v. ROSENBAUM
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Mar 9, 2000
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On the record presented, the Supreme Court's determination and apportionment of the Law Guardian's fee was not improper (see,Matter of Bungay v. Morin, 256 A.D.2d 462 ; Petek v. Petek, 239 A.D.2d 327 ; Richards v. Richards, 189 A.D.2d 1025 ; Matter of Mouscardy v. Mouscardy, 63 A.D.2d 973 ).
The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.
RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, KRAUSMAN, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.