Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MATTER OF DOBBINS v. VARTABEDIAN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Mar 9, 2000
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith; and it is further,

ORDERED that the father shall retain custody pending a new determination.

It is axiomatic that custody determinations are to be made upon consideration of all relevant circumstances to reach the disposition that promotes the best interests of the child (see,Domestic Relations Law ยง 70[a]; Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167 ; Friederwitzer v. Friederwitzer, 55 N.Y.2d 89, 93-95 ; Matter of DiMedio v. DiMedio, 233 A.D.2d 394 ).

The Family Court properly concluded, after a hearing, that the mother wilfully and repeatedly deprived the father of his rights to visitation with his child and therefore was in contempt of court for violating the order dated January 26, 1999, directing that the father have visitation (see, Gagliardo v. Gagliardo, 151 A.D.2d 718, 720 ). However, the hearing in this proceeding was insufficient to determine the best interests of the child. Accordingly, the order awarding custody to the father must be reversed and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Suffolk County for such a hearing.

MANGANO, P.J., BRACKEN, LUCIANO, and SMITH, JJ., concur.