IN RE FEMALE W

The finding of abandonment is supported by clear and convincing evidence, namely, the testimony of the child's caseworker, that respondent had no contact with the child or the agency for at least six months prior to the filing of the petition. There is no reason to disturb Family Court's findings discrediting respondent's testimony concerning telephone contact she had with the agency (see, Matter of Jose Ramon V., 264 A.D.2d 661, 695 N.Y.S.2d 88). In any event, even if such testimony were to be credited, the alleged contact with the agency, considered together with the two contacts respondent had with the child's foster parent, were too minimal and half-hearted to preclude a finding of abandonment (see, Matter of Christopher Rene T., 189 A.D.2d 692, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 709). We find that termination of respondent's parental rights was in the child's best interests (Social Services Law § 384-b[3][I]; see, Matter of Atina C., 234 A.D.2d 997).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.