- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
MATTER OF EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PUSEY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Apr 3, 2000
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
An insurance carrier seeking to stay the arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim has the burden of establishing that the offending vehicle was insured at the time of the accident (see,Matter of American Home Assur. Co. v. Wai Ip Wong, 249 A.D.2d 301 ). The proof submitted by the petitioner , a letter from Continental Insurance Company (hereinafter CIC), the offending vehicle's alleged carrier , failed to establish prima facie that the offending vehicle was insured on the date of the accident. In any event, the proof submitted by CIC established that CIC did not insure the offending vehicle on the date of the accident (see,Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v. Patrik, 249 A.D.2d 327 ).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.