Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

BRENHOUSE v. SHAH REALTY CORPORATION

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Apr 13, 2000
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To recover a real estate broker's commission on an unclosed transaction, the plaintiff must establish that he or she procured a prospect who was ready, willing, and able to purchase on the seller's terms (see, Sopher v. Martin, 243 A.D.2d 459 ; Mecox Realty Corp. v. Rose, 202 A.D.2d 404 ).

Here, once the defendant established a prima facie case, the plaintiff was required to lay bare his proof and present evidence in admissible form sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact that a ready, willing, and able buyer existed (see, Russo v. Pergament Home Center, Inc., 266 A.D.2d 369 [2d Dept, Nov. 15, 1999]). The plaintiff failed to meet this burden.