PEOPLE v. GREEN

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his argument concerning the prosecutor's cross-examination of one of his witnesses by failing to make timely, specifically tailored objections during trial (see, People v. Hernandez, 260 A.D.2d 399, 400). In any event, the record supports the trial court's determination that the prosecutor "adequately demonstrated his good faith and possessed a sufficient basis for asking the challenged question[s]" (People v. Kass, 25 N.Y.2d 123, 126; People v. Sealy, 167 A.D.2d 362, 363). Moreover, the trial court instructed the jury that questions alone are not in evidence.

BRACKEN, J.P., O'BRIEN, KRAUSMAN and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.