Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

DUPERVAL v. HOYLE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
May 8, 2000
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Since the plaintiffs failed to take proceedings for the entry of judgment within one year after the defendants' default, the Supreme Court did not err in granting the defendants' motion to vacate the default judgment and in dismissing the complaint (see, CPLR 3215 [c]; cf., Woodward v. City of New York, 119 A.D.2d 749; Rosenbaum v. Ace Tr. Corp., 112 A.D.2d 210).

BRACKEN, J.P., JOY, THOMPSON, GOLDSTEIN and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.