Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

HINDERHOFER v. DAISY MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
May 15, 2000
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
Attorney(S)

Hobbes Tonetti (Sweetbaum Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N Y [Marshall D. Sweetbaum] of counsel), for appellant. John F. Clennan, Ronkonkoma, N.Y., for plaintiffs-respondents. John H. Mulvehill, St. James, N.Y., for defendant-respondent Christopher Calderone. Scibilia Polacco Aledort, Hempstead, N.Y. (William B. McTiernan of counsel), for defendant-respondent Commercial Union Insurance Company, s/h/a Commercial Union Insurance Companies.

JUDGES

Robert J. Miller

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there are triable issues of fact (see, CPLR 3212[b]) as to whether the appellant's negligent entrustment of an air rifle to the infant defendant was the proximate cause of the injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff.

RITTER, J.P., SULLIVAN, S. MILLER, LUCIANO and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x