MEJIA v. CITY OF NEW YORK

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendant Tina Angeline for summary judgment, as she failed to meet her initial burden of producing evidence sufficient to demonstrate her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). The court also properly denied the motion of the defendant 953 Manhattan Food Corporation, d/b/a C-Town Supermarket, for summary judgment, as issues of fact remain as to whether its snow and ice removal efforts made the sidewalk upon which the plaintiff Moises Mejia fell more hazardous (see, Verdino v. Alexandrou, 253 A.D.2d 553; Reidy v. Eze Equip. Co., 234 A.D.2d 593; Oley v. Village of Massapequa Park, 198 A.D.2d 272).

RITTER, J.P., SULLIVAN, S. MILLER, LUCIANO and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.