Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. D'AUGUSTINO

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
May 10, 2000

Memorandum:

County Court properly denied defendant's suppression motion following a hearing. The court's findings are afforded great weight ( see, People v. Earley, 244 A.D.2d 769, 770) and are supported by the record ( see, People v. Mena-Cross, 210 A.D.2d 745, 746, lv denied 86 N.Y.2d 798; People v. Greenberg, 187 A.D.2d 528, 529, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 971). Contrary to the contention of defendant, his physical appearance and admitted drinking, together with his inability to pass sobriety tests, provided the arresting officer with probable cause to arrest him for driving while intoxicated ( see, People v. Schmitt, 262 A.D.2d 588, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 829; People v. Tittensor, 244 A.D.2d 784, 784-785; People v. Schroeder, 229 A.D.2d 917).