SALVIETERRA v. HAVEKOTTE

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Elisa Salvicterra, a housekeeper for the defendants, sustained second and third degree burns when they directed her to manually clean their self-cleaning oven. The defendants allegedly provided her with an old pair of gloves and "Easy-Off" oven cleaner which penetrated the gloves causing her injuries.

The defendants breached their duty to provide the injured plaintiff with a safe place to work by directing her to clean the oven with defective gloves ( see, Adlam v. Konvalinka, 291 N.Y. 40). A reasonable inspection would have revealed that the gloves were not suited for the task ( see, Adlam v. Konvalinka, supra).

The trial court properly charged the jury with both assumption of risk and inherent compulsion. The plaintiff established that she was directed by her employer to do the act which caused her injury and that she was under an inherent compulsion to comply with that direction ( see, Broderick v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co., 301 N.Y. 182). We further find that the dual jury charges of assumption of risk and inherent compulsion were proper and did not confuse the jury ( see, Porter v. Avlis Contr. Corp., 57 A.D.2d 222).

The jury's finding that the defendants were 100% at fault in the happening of the accident was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, Ruscito v. Early, 253 A.D.2d 461). In addition, the damages award did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation ( see, CPLR 5501; Donofrio v. Montalbano, 240 A.D.2d 617).