Bookmark
PDF
Share
CaseIQ

JOHNSON v. STATE

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jun 22, 2000

Judgment

Subsequent
References

CaseIQ

Important Paras

Please sign up to view Important Paras.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Johnson v. State, 717 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), on the basis of express and direct conflict. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in Maddox v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S367 (Fla. May 11, 2000), we approve the decision below.

We decline to address the other issues raised by Johnson that are not the basis of our jurisdiction. See, e.g., Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592, 595 n. 3 (Fla. 1999); McMullen v. State, 714 So.2d 368, 373 (Fla. 1998).

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.