IN RE APPLICATION OF BURKHART v. WEBBER

Petitioner's appeal is moot since, subsequent to the entry of the order of protection to which petitioner now objects, petitioner consented, as a condition of having her criminal case adjourned in contemplation of dismissal, to the imposition of a superseding order of protection incorporating the challenged portions of the subject order of protection (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.