- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUN. v. ANONYMOUS ATTORNEY
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 27, 2000
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 27th day of September, 2000, it is ordered that the charges docketed at No. 22 DB 1998 be dismissed.
Mr. Justice Nigro files a dissenting statement.
MR. JUSTICE NIGRO, DISSENTING.
I dissent because I find that there was clear and sufficient evidence to establish that Respondent committed numerous violations of Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.