Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. MOYE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Sep 29, 2000
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of forgery in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.10), criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (two counts) (Penal Law § 165.45) and petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25). He contends that the proof of guilt is legally insufficient in several respects. Because he made only a general motion to dismiss based on legally insufficient evidence, his contention is not preserved for our review ( see, People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10, 19; People v. Shannon, 269 A.D.2d 839; People v. Schultz, 266 A.D.2d 919, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 906) and, in any event, lacks merit. The evidence is legally sufficient to establish defendant's involvement as an accomplice ( see, Penal Law § 20.00) in a scheme to steal property with a stolen credit card. We reject defendant's contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence ( see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495).