POLLACK v. POLLACK

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the terms of the judgment of divorce, the parties were obligated to "mutually confer and decide upon all important issues related to the children's health, education and welfare", and the plaintiff was required to "pay for * * * summer camp expense". Since there is no evidence that the parties "mutually confer[red] and decide[d]" what summer camps the children would attend, the plaintiff's obligation to pay for their summer camp expenses was never triggered. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly found that he had not violated the provisions of the judgment of divorce (see, Leifer v. Leifer, 230 A.D.2d 717; see also, Matter of Citera v. D'Amico, 251 A.D.2d 662; Matter of Levenson v. Levenson, 166 A.D.2d 592).